Grant Whitmore
Grant is an academic integrity consultant with 9+ years advising institutions on policy and casework. He writes about the gap between a detection signal and evidence of misconduct, and about review processes that still hold up when a student contests the score.
Author Snapshot
- Detection signals vs. evidence
- Fair and repeatable review procedures
- Conversations with students and staff
- Policy wording and appeals
About
Grant Whitmore advises schools and departments on using detection tools without letting a percentage become a verdict.
He sets out the review steps — draft history, version metadata, source checks, a direct conversation — that make a decision defensible after the fact.
Grant specializes in procedures that protect academic standards and the person named in the report at the same time.
Areas of Expertise
- Academic integrity policy
- Casework and appeals
- Evidence standards
- Staff and student guidance
Editorial & Review Approach
Guidance is conservative and process-first: no accusation language, no decision resting on a single number, and a clear line drawn between a signal and proof.
Writing Focus
Grant's articles are written for:
- Teachers and reviewers handling a flagged submission
- Students responding to an AI-detection concern
- Administrators drafting or revising institutional policy